EclectEcon

Economics and the mid-life crisis have much in common: Both dwell on foregone opportunities

C'est la vie; c'est la guerre; c'est la pomme de terre                                     A View from/of the Econochasm by John Palmer

Richard Posner deserves the next Nobel Prize in Economics
Please consider using these links if you are ordering from Amazon: Amazon.com, Amazon.ca, Amazon.uk

<< main
Google Sky and Worldwide Telescope
Nearly a year ago, I started playing around with Google Earth, a fascinating programme that allows one to view different portions of the earth from different perspectives (thanks to Duncan, who introduced me to geocaching and many programmes like Google Earth that are strong complements). One of the really neat things I could do was upload the route of one of my treks through the Yorkshire Dales (the route was saved on a hand-held GPS), and then show Ms. Eclectic where I'd been and what I'd seen. I could even show her the view from where I sat on a hillside and called her to exclaim about the beauty of the Dales.

A few months ago, Google Earth was expanded to include Google Sky, a programme designed for exploring the skies. And now Worldwide Telescope, in conjunction with Microsoft, has brought out WWT, an amazing programme for astronomical dabblings. From the NYTimes,
There may be no space war between Microsoft and Google, but their offerings reflect their different cultures. The WorldWide Telescope results from careful planning and lengthy development in a research division. It has the richer graphics and it created special software to present the images of spherical space objects with less polar distortion. WorldWide Telescope requires downloading a hefty piece of software, and it runs only on Microsoft Windows.

Google Sky started as a Google “20 percent” project, in which engineers can spend time on anything they choose. Google Earth, where Google Sky began, requires a software download, but its Web-based version, which came out in March, does not. The Google culture encourages engineers to put new things onto the Internet quickly and keep improving them, a philosophy geared to constant evolution instead of finished products.
Both programmes require some experience with them to understand how they work. As usual, Google pretty much says "do what you want" but has fewer features; and Microsoft says, "do it our way" with many more features; and the tradeoff between the two approaches makes the choice difficult. So I play with both

Category: Eclectic Miscellany Posted on Wednesday, May 14, 2008 at 2:06am
<< main






To leave a comment, please post as "guest"
Tom Hanna (mail) (www):
Another big way that the sources show is that Microsoft's product requires a substantially better hardware setup. My new laptop would run it...except the OS is a Linux distribution not a Windows OS. The old desktop runs Google Earth just fine, but is too slow and too little memory by half to run the MS product.
5.14.2008 3:46am
© 2005