The history of mankind is the history of the struggle between the Active Man and the Passive, between the individual and the collective. The countries which have produced the happiest men, the highest standards of living and the greatest cultural advances have been the countries where the power of the collective — of the government, of the state — was limited and the individual was given freedom of independent action. As examples: The rise of Rome, with its conception of law based on a citizen's rights, over the collectivist barbarism of its time. The rise of England, with a system of government based on the Magna Carta, over collectivist, totalitarian Spain. The rise of the United States to a degree of achievement unequaled in history — by grace of the individual freedom and independence which our Constitution gave each citizen against the collective.
While men are still pondering upon the causes of the rise and fall of civilizations, every page of history cries to us that there is but one source of progress: Individual Man in independent action. Collectivism is the ancient principle of savagery. A savage's whole existence is ruled by the leaders of his tribe. Civilization is the process of setting man free from men.
<< main
To leave a comment, please post as "guest"





Principlex
I'm not much of a historian, but there was what seemed to me to be a lot of progress under collectivism at times in history. But, of course, that begs the question as to what is meant by "progress" and how one might measure it.
That having been said, I think her case was much more compelling for the past 200 years.
But even more, I don't think progress, however measured and however defined, is the most important reason for wanting more individual freedom.